Hop length — where it appears
Named by 15 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Two rankings, one list
An essay in this collection claimed that the four shortest index hops on a seed head and the four largest shares of its cell walls are the same four numbers in the same order, and called the correspondence exact. Measured again from the same points, the two lists hold the same four families and order them differently, and they order them differently in five of the six bands the head can be read in.
The empty interval is the rings
No single cut-off on hop ratio turns the contacts a count keeps into the walls a tessellation draws, on any whole head at any size. Read cell by cell against the flip rings the divergence angle puts in closed form, every disputed cell lies within two thirds of a wall spacing of a ring, and with one spacing either side set aside a single cut-off between 1.430 and 1.444 serves every golden head from 900 organs to 9,000.
The blur was at the centre
On a Lucas head the band of disputed cells round each flip ring looked blurred at its inner edge — exact cells as close as 0.23 of a wall spacing, disputed hexagons out to 0.59 where a golden head's stop at 0.43. Read a ring at a time, the two heads carry the same band on every resolved ring, to a hundredth: disputed hexagons within 0.16, exact cells from 0.64, a ring's own number of fives and of sevens and the number before it of hexagons. Every difference is inside a radius of six, where the Lucas rings of 4, 7 and 11 sit closer together than the band is wide, and the one exact cell is organ 17, which has no organ eighteen behind it.
A hundredth of a spacing
Off the flip rings one hop-ratio cut-off turns a seed head's counted contacts into its cell walls, on every head from 900 organs to 9,000. Displace the organs and it is the first thing to go: shut by a fiftieth of a wall spacing on 900 organs and a two-hundredth on 9,000, because it is decided by the worst of thousands of cells. The three-family count survives two to four times further, because each cell only has to beat its own margin, and the rings keep their fives and sevens in between. All three fail from the rim inward, since the margin one spacing from a ring is 9.7 divided by the ring's family number.
The band moves, it does not blur
Displaced organ by organ, a seed head loses its single contact cut-off first, its rings' hold on their fives and sevens next and its three-family count last. Displaced by a smooth field that moves neighbours together, the same head keeps its census — the same 353 disputed cells and 264 fives and sevens at every step up to a third of a spacing — and moves the band instead. A twist moves each flip ring exactly to where the twisted divergence puts its tie, the ring of 55 by 0.53 of a spacing, the ring of 34 the other way. Read against strain, correlation helps the cut-off and not the count, and on a 900-organ head the two fail at the same step: the order was an order of blurring.
A fifth cluster
A correction to the exchange's size was fitted over four hop clusters and its own file said so. A search turned up a fifth, at a hop smaller than any of the four, and the rule is right on it — which is what a prediction being confirmed looks like when the confirmation is worth having.
The twenty-first row
Recomputing the level moves one row out of the set the exchange sets aside and into the exchange itself. Its hop is four times larger than any the correction was fitted over, and the correction fails on it in the one way it had never failed.
One rise below the census
Ten lattices were cut at every offset and their surviving lags came back as four numbers. One rise further down a rung the census already sweeps, three cuts keep a lag of eleven — which is a fifth number, on a lattice nothing about was unusual except that nobody had cut it.
The lag that never survives
A correction to the exchange's size rests on four hop clusters, and a fifth would be the first real test of it. The prediction was written for a golden lattice at a lag of eleven. No golden lattice on this ladder reaches one, and the reason is a fact about the rule rather than about the search.
A family that is a multiple
When a wrecked cut keeps a family that is not one of the lattice's counted pair, the first case looked like a rule: it was half of one of them. The second case is four times the other, which makes the rule a coincidence and leaves a weaker statement that is probably the true one.
One step of the grid, again
A search of the fine end stepped from one rise to another a hundred grid steps away, and the family a cut keeps changed somewhere between. Cutting the rises in between puts the change inside one step, with the lattice identical on both sides.
The hops cross once
Walking a whole rung at the grid its rises are named on costs a few hundred stems and no cuts at all, and it answers a question nobody had asked: whether a rung has one handover or several. It has one, and the ladder had recorded it in the wrong place.
Two rises far apart
The whole handover thread rests on the claim that where the two contact steps change places is not where the survivor does. On one rung both rises are now located to a single step of the grid, and they sit forty-five per cent of the rung apart.
Five rungs walked
Six rungs of the ladder carry a handover and only one of them had ever been walked at the resolution its rises are named on. Walking the other five costs 1,224 grown stems and no cuts at all, and it returns a crossing count per rung — five ones and a five.
One crossing or two
One rung of the ladder changes hands five times where the other five change hands once, and the difference is not in the geometry. It is a divergence read in steps against an ordering that slides, and the account is a threshold at one that is right on all six rungs.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Contact familyHonest limitsClaim testingResolutionAblationNegative resultRungInstrument settingCut-offDefect ringDiscretisationHandover