Generator

how-many-rings

The gaps between consecutive rings are 1.626, 1.631, 1.657, 1.763. Two rings give one gap and no way to disagree with itself; three give two gaps and a fit with nothing left over. The question is how many gaps it takes for their spread to exceed what the measuring error can explain, and the answer depends on the error as much as on the organ.
At 3.0 per cent on each ring, no number of rings shows the driftThe gaps between consecutive rings are 1.626, 1.631, 1.657, 1.763. Two rings give one gap and no way to disagree with itself; three give two gaps and a fit with nothing left over. The question is how many gaps it takes for their spread to exceed what the measuring error can explain, and the answer depends on the error as much as on the organ.error per ringrings neededspread vs bound1%4 of 5 rings1.9% > 1.4%1%5 of 5 rings8.2% > 2.8%2%5 of 5 rings8.2% > 5.7%3%not on this oneunder 8.5%5%not on this oneunder 14.1%8%not on this oneunder 22.6%an ogive · 5 rings availableno rings at 3%

Drawn at its defaults, in organs with no single exponent. It takes no options at all, so every essay calling it gets this exact drawing.

Called by 2 essays

the blast radius of changing it

All 105 generators