Generator

limit-angles

The golden angle is the k = 1 member of a family. Real bijugate plants — teasel, *Cephalaria* — are reported near 68.75°, which is exactly half of it, and the pairs they are counted at are the Fibonacci pairs doubled.
six limit divergences, all of them 137.5078 over a whole numberThe golden angle is the k = 1 member of a family. Real bijugate plants — teasel, *Cephalaria* — are reported near 68.75°, which is exactly half of it, and the pairs they are counted at are the Fibonacci pairs doubled.1-jugate137.5078°counts 3/52-jugate68.7539°counts 6/103-jugate45.8359°counts 9/154-jugate34.3769°counts 12/205-jugate27.5016°counts 15/256-jugate22.9180°counts 18/30limit divergence6 jugacies137.5078 / k

Drawn at its defaults, in whorls, and patterns with k at a time. It takes no options at all, so every essay calling it gets this exact drawing.

Called by 8 essays

the blast radius of changing it

The claims, measured

The claim that survives

Of the three famous assertions about this subject, one is out by a factor of two, one is true of a branch rather than of plants, and one is right — in a sharper form than the version usually told, and about arithmetic rather than about packing.

The claims, measured

What "whorled" was hiding

The expansion phase's census put 35% of divergences in a bucket labelled whorled and moved on. Opened, every pair in it is k and 2k — the coarsest rung of the ladder, repeated k times — and reading the census up to jugacy takes the Fibonacci share from 14.7% to 50.1% without describing a single extra plant.

The pattern itself

Two at a time

Every counter on this site asks how far it is from element i to element i plus m, and that index is a claim that the elements arrived one at a time. For teasel, for Cephalaria and for a real minority of plants the claim is false — and what those patterns turn out to be is an ordinary lattice, wrapped twice.

The pattern itself

Counting without an index

A person counting spirals on a cone puts a finger on one scale, follows a family round, and counts how many distinct chains there are. That needs no order of arrival — and building it turns out to be strictly more general than the counter the site had, and to find a bug in the counting of a bijugate stem that no assertion would have caught.

Stems and cones

The forks are exact

Where a stem's pattern has to choose between two futures, three spiral families are equally short and the lattice is exactly equilateral. A numerical solver found those points; the numbers it returned turned out to be rational, and chasing that gave a closed form — including the fact that every fork sits at a rational divergence, and the golden angle at none of them.

The pattern itself

Half the golden angle

The forks of the van Iterson tree converge on 137.5078° and sit at none of them. Divide the whole tree by two and the same thing happens at 68.7539° — which is where teasel is, and where a bijugate sunflower counted 42 and 68 has to be.

The claims, measured

The angle is not the object

Every popular account of phyllotaxis is organised around a number. After a phase spent on stems, forks and frequencies, the number looks like the wrong thing to organise an account around — it is the limit of one path through a branching structure, it is at no fork, and a plant that has it got there by not jumping.

The claims, measured

The survey this site cannot do

Four phases of asking for a dataset, and it is still not here. What this phase can do instead is specify it — the fields, the sampling, the sizes, and which of this collection's claims each one would settle. Two of the four fields asked for turn out to be worth less than the asking implied, and one was never asked for at all.

All 105 generators