Generator

ratio-by-grid

The comb ratio and the recorded divergence scatter at a rise of 0.005, against how finely the rule samples the circle when it takes its minimum. At 384 azimuths — the grid every flat run on this site uses, and the grid the previous phase's 0.65 was measured on — the step is 0.94°, which is larger than the 0.25° disturbance the stems carry. The quantisation is white noise, it dilutes both combs, and it does not dilute them equally. The ratio settles at 0.82 from 1152 azimuths up, and the scatter loses 0.19° that belonged to the grid rather than to the stem.
At 384 azimuths the ratio is 0.62; converged it is 0.82The comb ratio and the recorded divergence scatter at a rise of 0.005, against how finely the rule samples the circle when it takes its minimum. At 384 azimuths — the grid every flat run on this site uses, and the grid the previous phase's 0.65 was measured on — the step is 0.94°, which is larger than the 0.25° disturbance the stems carry. The quantisation is white noise, it dilutes both combs, and it does not dilute them equally. The ratio settles at 0.82 from 1152 azimuths up, and the scatter loses 0.19° that belonged to the grid rather than to the stem.0.4000.6000.8001azimuths the rule samples the circle at (logarithmic)ratio, and the scatter a protractor would record, in degrees384768115215362304ratioscatterthis phase works hererise 0.005 · 5 stems a pointgenerated from a stated rule, not drawn to look right

Drawn at its defaults, in the ratio, across a rung. It takes no options at all, so every essay calling it gets this exact drawing.

Called by 3 essays

the blast radius of changing it

All 144 generators