Lewis — the series
-
Lewis's law wants disorder
Cell area rises linearly with side count — measured on cucumber epidermis in 1928 and quoted ever since as a property of packed tissue. It holds beautifully on a random point set, with a fitted constant of 1.64 against Lewis's 2. On a phyllotactic head it does not hold at all: the slope is 0.009, and area and side count are almost independent.
-
Lewis's law needs the sides to vary
Lewis's law holds on a random set of points and fails on a golden-angle head. Walked from one to the other by displacing every organ independently, the head's Lewis slope reaches half a random set's at a fifth of a wall spacing and nine tenths by seven tenths, and in between it explains up to 41 per cent of the variation in cell area — more than the 31 per cent it explains in the random set. Moved instead by a smooth field correlated over eight spacings, the head's cell areas become nearly as varied as a random set's and its slope stays at nought, because its side counts stay the lattice's. The law is not about how varied the cells are. It is about how varied their sides are.
-
A gradient keeps Lewis's slope and takes its share
Lewis's law is reported as two numbers, a slope and how much of the variation in cell area it explains, and they get read as one. Grow a tissue's cell size steadily across the field of view and the two part completely. Over a gradient that takes cells from one size to several times that, the slope of a random tissue stays at 0.22 and its explained share falls from 33 per cent to 15. Both are predicted by a line of arithmetic from the flat tissue's own numbers, to within a percentage point or two. Dividing the field into twelve bands of radius restores nearly all of it. So a weak Lewis correlation in a published field may be a statement about the field.