Raup — the series
-
Raup's three numbers
Nearly every coiled shell that has ever existed is a point in a three-dimensional space — how fast the whorl expands, how far the opening sits from the axis, how far it travels along it. That is a remarkable compression, and the most useful line in the space is the one where the whorls come apart.
-
What the axis distance costs
Raup's contact boundary is a relation between two numbers and only one of them has ever been priced here. The second was expected to be the cheaper — a length against another length. It is not: an assumed centre costs it 79.3 per cent where the same centre costs the expansion 6.88, because a ratio of two distances is first order in the centre and a fitted rate is second. But a tilted camera costs it nothing at all, exactly, and averaging the reading round one whorl is free and worth a factor of 4.91. The two numbers fail at opposite ends, and they cross at 1.12 turns of arc.
-
The outline finds its own centre
A worker with a sawn shell has an outline and nothing else: the centre, the expansion W and the distance from the axis D all have to come off it at once, and three numbers fitted to one outline can trade against each other. Fitted together, they do not trade where it matters. Started from a centre guessed a quarter of the innermost radius off, the drawing locates its own centre to about a thousandth of that radius, and over a turn of section drawn to a thousandth of the rim it returns W to 0.12 per cent and D to 0.045 — where reading the same drawing at the guessed centre gives 16.8 and 0.98. W's error rides the centre's; D's does not, and W and D do not trade against each other at all. The trade the round trip was set to watch for appears only where the model is wrong: a view five degrees off the section's plane moves W by three times its own noise error while the fit's residual stays within the noise, because the free centre moves to absorb the squash.
-
The cut along the axis
A median section cannot see how far a shell travels along its axis, so the third of Raup's numbers seemed to need a second cut. It does not need the first. One cut through the axis shows every whorl twice a turn as a whole circle, and fitted with the axis free it returns W, D and T together — to 0.023, 0.085 and 0.031 per cent on a high spire drawn to a thousandth of its rim, from an axis laid a quarter of a radius off and two degrees out. On the shell the median section was read on, it reads the expansion twice as well over a turn and the distance from the axis as well. Laid by eye and left there, the axis costs T four per cent and a high spire's D thirteen, and the residual says so. What it does not always say is that the saw missed the axis: on a low spire a cut a fifth of the innermost radius off moves W by two and a half times its own noise error with the residual at the noise.
-
An opening that is not round
One cut through a shell's axis returns Raup's three numbers to a few hundredths of a per cent when every section is a circle. A snail's opening is closer to an ellipse. Read with circles, a cut of a shell whose opening is a quarter taller than it is wide gives W exactly and puts the whole misfit into the other two: D comes back 29 per cent low and T 4.9 per cent low, by a first-order form in which the circle takes the ellipse's mean half-axis. A nearly round opening is the dangerous one — an aspect of 0.99 moves D by fourteen of its own noise errors while the points miss their circles by only a quarter more than the noise. Fitted with ellipses, the cut reads all five shape numbers with W, D and T nearly as precise as before, and the opening's height does not trade against the spire's translation.
-
A photograph squashed along the axis is another shell
A cut shell is photographed, not measured with calipers, and a camera a few degrees off the face's normal squashes the whole picture across one bearing. Read as a shell with elliptical openings, a squash straight across the axis or along it is absorbed without a trace: the picture is exactly that of another shell, its openings ellipses and its translation off by the squash — six per cent at a twenty-degree tilt — and no fit can tell. At any bearing between, the squash turns every opening the same way on both sides of the axis, which a real opening, mirrored across the axis, never does: a ten-degree tilt at fifteen to seventy-five degrees from the axis is caught on every section. The common photograph, the shell upright in the frame and the camera off to one side, is the one that cannot be caught.
-
A cut seen in perspective is not another shell
A photograph of a cut shell squashed straight along the axis is exactly the picture of another shell, with nothing to tell them apart. A camera close enough to see the cut in perspective is different. The near whorls come out larger than the far ones, and a whorl's size then changes across the picture in a way no shell's own expansion does — so the reading that fitted a distant photograph misses a near one by more than the noise, even straight along the axis. Before it is seen the error is small, W read too large by about the sine of the tilt over the distance. A camera fitted beside the shell, three numbers more, takes it back entirely: W, D and T within a third of a per cent at every bearing and every distance down to three rim radii.
-
A free opening lets the camera trade again
A camera fitted beside a shell recovered every photographed cut whose openings were round. Give the opening its own shape — an aspect and a turn, as a snail's has — and the twelve numbers recover everything only when the camera's tilt runs at a bearing between the axis and the line across it. Straight across or along the axis, a pinhole tilted τ at L rim radii is exactly a pinhole tilted τ′ at L′ followed by a squash, whenever tan τ′/L′ = tan τ/L, and that squash is another shell. Every camera on the line fits a noiseless picture to rounding. The fit keeps W and the perspective's strength, and nothing else about the camera: T and the aspect come back scaled by a ratio of cosines, a turned opening's turn and its D move with them, and on noisy pictures T ran from six per cent low to a quarter high with every picture fitted inside the noise.
-
Two photographs pin the shell only from two sides
A photograph of a cut shell whose opening has its own shape, taken straight across or along the axis, fits every camera on a line, and each camera on the line reads a different shell. A second photograph of the same cut shares the shell and brings a camera of its own. Taken at the same bearing — farther away, or steeper — it does not help: the two cameras slide together along a family set by one closed form, cos τ₁′/cos τ₁ = cos τ₂′/cos τ₂, each picture fitted to rounding at every point of it, and the shell slides with them. Turned so that its tilt runs across a different direction, it pins the shell, and on noisy pictures a turn of ten degrees is already enough.
-
Two free frames cost one right angle
Two photographs of one cut shell pin it only when their cameras stand at different bearings, and the pair at right angles read best of all. Each of those fits was handed both pictures in one frame, and no real pair comes that way. Give the second picture a frame of its own, rotated and scaled and shifted, and leave the reading to find it: nineteen numbers, not fifteen. It costs almost nothing. The rotation comes back to a twentieth of a degree, the scale to under a tenth of a per cent, and the shell's numbers as well as before, except at one bearing. At exactly ninety degrees a free scale swallows one camera's squash whole, the fit slides, and the pair that had been best reads the translation twenty-three times worse than a pair at forty-five.