Phyllotaxis
the spirals are counted, not admired
Concept

Branch selection — where it appears

The question of what decides which family of divergence angles a stem ends up on. The answer here is not optimality but history and rate: the seed sets the basin, and a fast enough rise leaves no time to leave it.

Named by 4 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

What a divergence picked at random gives, at a rise of 0.100. Fibonacci pairs take 59.6% of the circle at this rise, and the share falls as the rise does. The claim that Fibonacci counts are what nature "prefers" needs the preference to come from somewhere, and it is not from the geometry being generous.

How often is it Fibonacci

The claim that plant spirals come in consecutive Fibonacci numbers is stated as a near-universal. Asked of the geometry, the answer collapses with scale — at a coarse rise 67% of divergences give Fibonacci pairs, and at a fine one 15%, with whorled and unnamed pairs taking the rest.

wrong · Frequency Two paths down the same tree. Both start at the same first fork. Keeping the larger family every time reaches 137.473°; one different choice reaches 99.549°. Neither angle is in the arithmetic — both are limits of a path.

The tree and the attractor

The dynamical model settles on the golden angle over a range of one parameter and on the Lucas angle outside it, and it cannot reach the low-growth end at all. The lattice tree reaches everywhere, has no dynamics in it, and produces the same two angles as limits of two paths. Two routes, one pair of numbers.

emergence · Branch tree Placements that went to a different minimum, per thousand. The rule's own counterfactual, run beside it: where would this node have gone with the noise taken away and everything else left alone? Placement noise displaces the node after the argmin, so the answer is always "here" — 0.2°, 0.4°, 0.8° all give zero. A jostle and a field perturbation are upstream of the choice and change one or two placements in a thousand while the lattice is still intact.

Which minimum was chosen

The rule takes an argmin, so there are two completely different things noise can do to it: move the answer, or move the question. One of them can change what is chosen and the other cannot, ever — and the difference is exactly zero against one or two placements in a thousand, at amplitudes where every other measurement says the two are identical.

emergence · Noise entry One rule, one rise, two branches that stay where they were put. The top 70 organs of two stems grown by the same placement rule at the same rise of 0.013, differing only in the stretch of ideal lattice each was started from. The left one was seeded at the golden angle and settles at 136.781° with the pair 5/8; the right one was seeded on the Lucas lattice and settles at 99.785° with 4/7. Neither drifts towards the other: 0.73° and 0.28° from where each was seeded, over four hundred organs. That is what makes an intervention on the right-hand stem a measurement about a different lattice rather than about a different rule — and 4 and 7 are not Fibonacci numbers, which is the property the experiment needs.

A stem on the other branch

Every stem an organ had been cut from carried Fibonacci counts, which is why two rival explanations of the block a wrecked stem settles into had never disagreed. A stem seeded on the Lucas lattice carries four and seven at the same rise, under the same rule. Cut, it settles on seven — the larger number, and not a Fibonacci one.

cylinder · Branch choice

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

RiseAttractorBranchContinuityDivergence angleMeasurementMetastabilityParastichy pairThe placement ruleAblationBasinBifurcation

All concepts