Concept

Free parameter — where it appears

A number a stated rule leaves undetermined, so that anything computed from the rule is really computed at some unstated choice of it. Two were found here by looking: the constant area conservation leaves in a branching weight, and the cut-off at which a counted contact is read as a shared wall.

Named by 15 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The three weights at an exponent of 2 and 3: one closes a triangle and one is a straight line. A branch point minimising a weighted sum of three lengths has an interior solution only when the three weights close a triangle, and the weight on a segment here is its own cross-section. At an exponent of 3 the three areas clear that condition by 0.4126, and the triangle they close is what the two fork angles are read off. At an exponent of 2 the parent's area is exactly the daughters' areas summed — that is what area conservation says — so the slack is -4.44e-16, the triangle collapses onto a line, and the fork closes to 0.0000 degrees. Leonardo's rule does not predict a different angle here; it predicts no angle.

A rule that predicts everything

Leonardo's rule says a fork conserves cross-section, and cross-section is exactly the weight the branch point is minimised against. So the three weights land on the boundary of the triangle inequality, the cosine comes out at one to the last bit, and the rule predicts no angle at all — and the free constant its own derivation leaves behind then walks the prediction across every angle a fork could have.

branching · Fork angle
The fork angle Da Vinci's rule predicts, against the size of the fork, in one tree. A tree has one value of the constant Da Vinci's rule leaves free, so a fork's share of it falls as the square of the fork's size and the angle the rule predicts changes with size. For even forks it is 119.1° at a relative size of 0.1, 101.7° at a relative size of 0.5, 74.9° at a relative size of 1, 44.6° at a relative size of 2, 9.6° at a relative size of 10, where Murray's rule gives 74.93° at every size; for daughter ratio 0.5 it is 118.9° at a relative size of 0.1, 101.3° at a relative size of 0.5, 77.6° at a relative size of 1, 48.9° at a relative size of 2, 10.9° at a relative size of 10, where Murray's rule gives 77.58° at every size. From a total of 100° to 20° at an even fork is a factor of 8.93 in radius.

One constant for every fork

Da Vinci's rule leaves a free constant in the cost that sets a fork's angle, and running it over its range walks the predicted angle from nothing to 120 degrees, through Murray's 74.93. So no single fork can refute the rule. But the constant is one number for a whole tree, and a fork's share of it falls as the square of the fork's size — the constant is a radius axis. A tree spanning a factor of ten in radius must show forks from 29.4 degrees at its biggest to 111.6 at its smallest, a spread wider than one fork's flatness can hide, while Murray's angle is the same at every size.

branching · Fork angle
A cut-off would have to exceed 2.236 and not exceed 1.441, and nothing does both. Each of the 608 interior cells contributes two marks: its furthest wall, and its nearest partner that is not a wall, both in units of that cell's own shortest lag. A single cut-off would have to sit to the right of every mark of the first kind and to the left of every mark of the second, and the two clouds overlap — the extreme cases are 2.236 at 0.0 per cent of the radius and 1.441 at 60.0 per cent. So the interval is empty by a factor of 1.55, while 606 of the 608 cells have a cut-off that works for themselves.

No cut-off makes them one

Two different relations on a head have both been called neighbour: the shortest index lags a count keeps, and a shared Voronoi wall. A cut-off that turns the first into the second exists for almost every cell taken alone, and for no whole head at any size.

tissue · Neighbour definition
The fork angle the transport cost predicts on a tree sized by stress, against the size of the fork. A tree sized so that equal loads on its tips bend every branch to one stress conserves rᵖ with p set by how much shorter each branch is than its parent, λ. On such a tree the cost that fixes a fork's angle carries one constant, entering a fork of size s as s^(2p − 6), so the predicted angle changes with size unless p is three. With the constant set so that a fork of relative size one opens at Murray's 74.9°: At λ = 0.707 (p = 2.000) an even fork opens at 119.1°, 111.6°, 74.9°, 29.4°, 9.6° at relative sizes of 0.1, 0.32, 1, 3.2 and 10; at λ = 0.74 (p = 2.091) an even fork opens at 114.5°, 106.4°, 74.9°, 41.1°, 30.1° at relative sizes of 0.1, 0.32, 1, 3.2 and 10; at λ = 0.794 (p = 2.250) an even fork opens at 106.3°, 97.6°, 74.9°, 53.9°, 46.4° at relative sizes of 0.1, 0.32, 1, 3.2 and 10; at λ = 0.87 (p = 2.498) an even fork opens at 92.7°, 85.5°, 74.9°, 66.0°, 61.5° at relative sizes of 0.1, 0.32, 1, 3.2 and 10; at λ = 0.95 (p = 2.793) an even fork opens at 78.4°, 76.6°, 74.9°, 73.4°, 72.2° at relative sizes of 0.1, 0.32, 1, 3.2 and 10. Murray's rule opens every fork at 74.9°.

Forks on a tree sized by stress

Da Vinci's rule predicts that a tree's forks open wider as they get smaller, because the constant in its angle cost is one number for a tree and enters each fork scaled by its size. A tree sized for equal bending stress conserves an exponent set by how much shorter each branch is than its parent, and on such a tree the same constant enters each fork as its radius to the power 2p − 6. The trend survives at every length ratio short of one and shrinks with it: 105 degrees a decade of radius for a crown filling a plane, 83 at a length ratio of 0.74, 53 for a crown filling a volume, 13 at 0.9. Only a crown shortening about as fast as a volume-filling one fans wider across a tenfold range than one fork's flatness can hide.

branching · Fork angle
The band the counter chooses for itself, against how slowly the stem grows. The counter is given positions and no width. It fits the decay of the rise through the spacings of its own band's whorls and takes the band that spans a third of a rung of rise: 49 organs on the stem that falls over 150; 97 organs on the stem that falls over 300; 193 organs on the stem that falls over 600. A stem grown four times as slowly chooses a band 3.94 times as wide, because a third of a rung is a statement about rise and a width is a number of organs. That is exactly why no one width fits the seven stems, and why the previous reading found a stem for which none worked.

A band that follows the rise

The index-free counter reads a growing stem only inside a band of widths, and the upper edge is a third of a rung of rise rather than a number of organs — so a width right on one stem is wrong on another. A counter that fits the decay of the rise through the spacings of its own band's whorls, and takes the band spanning a third of a rung, chooses 49, 97 and 193 organs on stems falling over 150, 300 and 600. Given no width at all it reads within eight points of the best of eighteen fixed widths on six of the seven stems, matching it exactly on one and beating it on two. Refusing any band too narrow to have shown the rung above the pair it counted removes every reading of the rung below, on every stem — and costs between five and fifty-one points of correct reading to do it.

lattices · Chain counting
Read as whorls, the three jugacies fall on one line. The rate at which a stem seeded on the Lucas lattice gives that ladder up, against how long the seed is, for one, two and three organs a whorl. The three lie on top of each other at every seed length: 15 whorls gives 30.80, 30.80, 30.80; 20 whorls gives 42.35, 42.35, 40.42; 30 whorls gives 63.52, 63.52, 63.52; 40 whorls gives 85.66, 87.58, 85.66. Every departure is one or two steps of the grain the edge is bisected to, which is two whorls of rate — 1.925 whorls a rung at every jugacy and every edge drawn.

A seed measured in whorls

A Lucas seed's length counts whorls, and the number published earlier for the rate edge counts nothing at all. Grown from seeds of fifteen to eighty whorls at one, two and three organs a whorl, stems of every jugacy lose the seed at the same rate in whorls a rung for the same seed length in whorls — 30.80 at fifteen, 63.52 at thirty, identically across the three — and at the same seed length in organs they differ by a factor of 3.24. So the seed is measured in whorls, as the edge is. The other half is worse for the earlier reading: the edge is not a constant but 2.24 times the seed less three, straight to within 2.7 whorls a rung over a fivefold range, so the eighty-seven whorls a rung reported everywhere is a property of the forty-whorl seed nobody varied.

lattices · Jugate limit
The rate at which a Lucas seed is lost, read through four counting windows. Eighteen stems — one, two and three organs a whorl, seeded with 15 to 80 whorls of Lucas lattice — each with the edge found four times, through counting windows of 20, 26, 39, 52 folded nodes, the four dots at each seed drawn side by side. 17 of the 18 stems give the same organ through every window. The exception is three organs a whorl with a 30-whorl seed, where the widest window finds the edge at 207 organs against 201 for the others. A window twice as wide as the one every earlier reading used moves no other edge by an organ, so the window is not what makes the ratio of edge to seed change with the seed.

The window was not carrying it

The ratio of a Lucas seed's rate edge to its length rose from 2.05 at fifteen whorls to 2.20 at eighty, and the suspect was the counting window, which is most of a short seed. Read through windows of 20, 26, 39 and 52 folded nodes, seventeen of the eighteen stems lose the seed at exactly the same organ of rate, so the window carries almost none of it. Part of the rise was the grain of rate the edge was found on, worth up to six hundredths of the ratio. What is left rises by a tenth below thirty whorls and has stopped by sixty, at a level an ordinary stem reaches about one and a half per cent lower than a bijugate or trijugate one — and a trijugate edge is not always a line.

lattices · Jugate limit
How often a cell on a 2,400-organ golden head has a wall the contact cut gets wrong, by its distance from the nearest flip ring. The 1,680 interior cells of a 2,400-organ golden head, grouped by distance from the nearest flip ring in twentieths of the head's wall spacing, 1.92. The bars are the share of each group with at least one wall a three-family contact cut gets wrong; the dots are the share with five or seven sides. 353 cells have such a wall and the farthest is 0.638 spacings from a ring. Of the 1,292 cells 0.66 spacings or more from every ring, none has.

The empty interval is the rings

No single cut-off on hop ratio turns the contacts a count keeps into the walls a tessellation draws, on any whole head at any size. Read cell by cell against the flip rings the divergence angle puts in closed form, every disputed cell lies within two thirds of a wall spacing of a ring, and with one spacing either side set aside a single cut-off between 1.430 and 1.444 serves every golden head from 900 organs to 9,000.

tissue · Neighbour definition
Which tilts buckling sizes and which bending sizes, deep in the crown and near its tips. Crowns at the planar length ratio, forks turned 20°, sized by the larger of buckling and bending, at five balance angles. For each, the upper bar runs from vertical to the widest tilt at which buckling sizes a branch seven or more generations above the tips, and on from the narrowest tilt bending sizes; the lower bar is the same reading within six generations of the tips. Balanced at 30°, buckling sizes the deep crown to 20° and bending from 40°, and near the tips buckling reaches 60°; balanced at 40°, buckling sizes the deep crown to 40° and bending from 60°, and near the tips buckling reaches 60°; balanced at 50°, buckling sizes the deep crown to 40° and bending from 60°, and near the tips buckling reaches 60°; balanced at 60°, buckling sizes the deep crown to 60° and bending from 80°, and near the tips buckling reaches 60°; balanced at 70°, buckling sizes the deep crown to 60° and bending from 80°, and near the tips buckling reaches 60°. In the deep crown the two never overlap at any generation, so the criterion is chosen by direction; near the tips the arms have not converged, the bending term is smaller, and the upright core is wider.

A crown that would rather not buckle

A column held below the load at which it buckles and a cantilever held to a fixed deflection need the same radius at every length, because both hold the bending stiffness against a load times a length squared — so the three halves of elastic similarity is also the buckling law, and a crown whose loads all run along its branches conserves the same exponent under either. Gravity does not run along branches. It divides by the cosine of each branch's tilt, so a buckling junction's exponent is set by the direction its parent points, nothing past level is sized at all, and a crown sized by the larger of the two criteria splits by direction into an upright core and a spreading shell whose boundary junctions conserve more than either rule gives.

branching · Murray
Fork angles on crowns sized by the larger of flow and stress, handing over at six different generations. Thirteen-generation crowns at a length ratio of 0.707, every branch sized by the larger of flow and stress, twigs at the radius the transport cost prefers, with the two radii equal at generations 3 to 8. Handing over at 3, the forks from the trunk open at 38, 51, 67, 75°; handing over at 4, the forks from the trunk open at 27, 38, 51, 67, 75°; handing over at 5, the forks from the trunk open at 19, 27, 37, 51, 67, 75°; handing over at 6, the forks from the trunk open at 13, 18, 26, 36, 50, 66, 75°; handing over at 7, the forks from the trunk open at 8, 12, 17, 24, 35, 49, 66, 75°; handing over at 8, the forks from the trunk open at 4, 6, 10, 15, 22, 32, 46, 65, 75°. Every fork from the handover outward opens at Murray's 74.9°. No fork on any of the six opens wider than that, and none turns back: the angle rises through the stress-sized generations and stops.

A trend that stops at Murray's angle

A crown sized by whichever of flow and bending stress asks for the thicker branch is sized by stress at its trunk end and by flow at its twigs, and the twigs fix the constant that was free in the fork-angle prediction: a twig at the radius the transport cost prefers spends exactly half its upkeep on pumping. On such a crown the fork angle does not change sign at the handover. It rises through every stress-sized generation, meets Murray's 74.93° at the handover and stays there, and no fork anywhere opens wider. The trend turns back only when the twigs are thinner than the cost wants — past a pumping share of (λ^(−2/3) − 1)/(1 − λ^(4/3)), 0.70 at the planar crown and closing on one half as branches stop shortening.

branching · Fork angle
The edge-to-seed ratio of ordinary stems that count one to five images of each neighbour. The ratio of the rate edge to the seed, on a fine rate, for ordinary stems whose repulsion counts each neighbour at one to five images a whole folded turn apart, at seeds of 15 to 80 whorls. one image: 2.076, 2.133, 2.175, 2.166, 2.186, 2.184, level 2.1848; two images: 2.065, 2.141, 2.175, 2.197, 2.215, 2.216, level 2.2155; three images: 2.075, 2.135, 2.178, 2.205, 2.224, 2.224, level 2.2237; four images: 2.073, 2.137, 2.176, 2.204, 2.222, 2.223, level 2.2226; five images: 2.074, 2.136, 2.177, 2.205, 2.223, 2.223, level 2.2231. One image is the ordinary stem and two the bijugate one; the step between them is the one and a half per cent the jugacies differ by, and the images beyond the second move the long seeds' level by less.

A whorl feels the far side of its stem

An ordinary stem keeps a long Lucas seed to an edge-to-seed ratio of 2.185 and a bijugate stem to 2.216, and the question was whether the difference follows the stem's angle or its timing. Folded, it is neither. A bijugate stem grown by the free rule is, node for node, an ordinary stem whose repulsion counts every neighbour twice round — once where it is and once a whole folded turn away — and that second copy is the whole of the difference. It carries an eighth of the repulsion where the seed is won or lost and a fortieth where the stem ends, and turned up from nothing it does nothing for its first quarter and then carries the ratio steadily from one level to the other.

lattices · Jugate limit
A crown sized against buckling on clamped bases, coloured by the share of that load each branch keeps on the base its parent really gives. A symmetric crown 9 generations deep, every branch 2^(−1/2) of its parent's length, turned 20° at every fork, with equal loads on the tips, sized against buckling as if every branch were clamped. Each branch is coloured by the share of its clamped buckling load it keeps once its base is the tip of a parent that bends, the parent alone: from 0.296 to 0.795 outside the trunk. A daughter turning back toward vertical off a steep parent keeps least, one turning outward most. Branches pointing level or down carry no compression and are drawn faint.

A base that gives

Every branch sized against buckling was a column clamped to a parent that does not move. A parent bends, and a column on a base that turns keeps only a share of its clamped load — the root of φ·tan φ = kL/EI — which no stiffening of the column itself lifts past the load at which a rigid rod on that base would tip. On the crown sized as if clamped, that share is 0.561 at every branch when the loads run along them, falls from the ground to 0.447 when the whole path is counted, and under gravity is a closed form in the turn from a parent's tilt to its daughter's: 0.795 for a daughter turning outward, 0.296 for one turning back upright off a steep parent. Resized for the bases they really have, the crown's junctions alternate about two from generation to generation, 226 branches of a thirteen-generation crown have no radius that holds them, and the cone of directions that divided buckling from bending no longer divides them.

branching · Murray
A crown whose parents are sized for the bases their daughters need, coloured by the term that sizes each branch. A symmetric crown 9 generations deep, every branch 2^(−1/2) of its parent's length, turned 20° at every fork, under gravity, sized from the trunk outward by the largest of three terms: the radius its own column needs on the base its parent gives, the base term its daughters demand at a margin of 2.5 over the load at which a rigid rod would tip on that base, and the bending rule, balanced against buckling on the trunk at 50°. The base term sizes 249 branches, the column term 238 and bending 24; no branch is left without a radius.

A parent sized for its daughters

A branch whose compression times its length exceeds what its parent's tip could hold as a rigid rod cannot be saved by thickening the branch; the requirement is the parent's. Size every parent for the base its daughters need, at a stated margin over that ceiling, and nothing in a crown is left without a radius. With every load along its branches the junctions stop alternating at one margin, 2.043 at the planar ratio, and conserve exactly two above it. Under gravity a junction sized this way conserves the clamped crown's closed form read one fork further up. Joined with bending, the cone of directions comes back, wider. And the cheapest crown sits below the margin at which the alternation stops, at about 1.6 to 1.7, so the zigzag is not waste.

branching · Murray
A crown sized branch by branch for its loads, and the shape it buckles in as one frame. An axial crown seven generations deep, every parent sized for the base its daughters need at a margin of 1.7 over the rigid-rod ceiling and every branch to carry its own load on its parent's spring, assembled as one planar frame of beam-column elements and buckled. The frame buckles at 0.205 of the loads it was sized for. The lowest mode, drawn over the crown, leans the trunk and the first forks and carries the crown above them over: the trunk holds 24 per cent of the mode's strain energy and the first three generations 68 per cent. The branch the per-branch model holds at the smallest margin is in generation 1 and carries 9.4 per cent.

A crown sized branch by branch buckles as one at a fifth of its load

Every branch of a crown can be sized to carry its own load on the spring its parent's tip gives it, and every parent for the base its daughters need — and the crown, assembled as one frame, still buckles at a fifth to a third of the loads it was sized for. The spring stood in for the parent; it did not stand in for the crown above a branch, which leans when the branch leans and hangs its loads further out. The mode lives at the bottom, in the trunk and the first forks, not in the branch the spring model marks weakest. And the cheapest margin moves: branch by branch it was 1.7; held as one frame it is 4, on a floor so flat that 1.7 costs under two per cent more.

branching · Murray
A crown of 63 branches after 8 steps of moving wood towards its lowest buckling mode. Each branch drawn to its radius, scaled so the whole crown just holds the loads it was sized for. At step 8 it takes 43.76 of wood where the uniform repair takes 44.89 and the best reached takes 43.76.

Moving the wood saves almost nothing

A crown sized branch by branch buckles as one frame at a fifth of its load, and the repair so far has been to thicken every branch alike. Its lowest mode lives in the trunk and the first forks, so thickening a twig looks like waste. Moving each branch's wood to match its share of the mode's strain energy tests that, and it finds one crown, the same from every starting margin to four figures. From the crown that margin of 1.7 had made cheapest it saves 2.5 per cent, and from a margin of four, one. A twig holds very little of the mode's energy and also very little of the wood. The best crown does not keep one exponent: from about two and a half at the trunk's fork it falls to about one and a quarter at the twigs.

branching · Murray

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Honest limitsClaim testingBranching exponentClosed formCriterion dependenceElastic similarityInstrument settingModel scopeDa Vinci's ruleFork angleMeasurementMurray's law

All concepts