Generator

wrecking-across-a-band

One row per offset and one column per rise, with a mark where a single removal at that offset wrecks the stem. The set is not the same at every rise: on this band one offset wrecks at only 27 of its 124 rises, in several separate stretches, while others wreck at all of them. So a census taken at one rise of a band and a census taken at another are censuses of different sizes, and every claim of the form "at every offset that wrecks" is quantified over a set the rise decides.
Which offsets wreck across the Lucas 7/11 band. One row per offset and one column per rise, with a mark where a single removal at that offset wrecks the stem. The set is not the same at every rise: on this band one offset wrecks at only 27 of its 124 rises, in several separate stretches, while others wreck at all of them. So a census taken at one rise of a band and a census taken at another are censuses of different sizes, and every claim of the form "at every offset that wrecks" is quantified over a set the rise decides.

Drawn at its defaults, in the second band, cut whole. It takes no options at all, so every essay calling it gets this exact drawing.

Called by 6 essays

the blast radius of changing it

Stems and cones

A band with nothing inside it

Five offsets wreck on the Lucas 7/11 band and every one of them keeps the same family at every rise it wrecks at. There are no islands, no transition region and no period to look for, which is what makes the picture from the other band a picture of that band.

Stems and cones

One rise below the census

Ten lattices were cut at every offset and their surviving lags came back as four numbers. One rise further down a rung the census already sweeps, three cuts keep a lag of eleven โ€” which is a fifth number, on a lattice nothing about was unusual except that nobody had cut it.

Stems and cones

The lag that never survives

A correction to the exchange's size rests on four hop clusters, and a fifth would be the first real test of it. The prediction was written for a golden lattice at a lag of eleven. No golden lattice on this ladder reaches one, and the reason is a fact about the rule rather than about the search.

Stems and cones

The second band, cut whole

One band was cut at every one of its rises and came back with a transition region โ€” a stretch where three offsets change their answer, in short islands with uneven gaps. The obvious question is whether that is a picture of bands or a picture of that band. The other wide band answers it.

Stems and cones

The wrecking set moves again

Which offsets wreck a stem was assumed to be a property of the lattice. On one band it turned out to be a property of the lattice and the rise, changing on nearly a fifth of that band's steps. On the second band it changes more, and one offset's wrecking is broken into five separate stretches.

Stems and cones

When nine rises are enough

A coarse design was shown to be misleading on one band and it has been criticised on that ground ever since. On the second band it is exactly right, and the difference between the two cases is a property of the band rather than of the design โ€” which is the awkward part.

All 268 generators