Ladder

Two windows — the ladder

2 distinct arguments against one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. -2.50-2-1.50-1-0.50005001e+31.5e+3node, counted from the base of the shoot — the rise falls as it climbsthe rise, logarithmicupper: 8/13lower: 8/13verdict: agree0.63 of a rung in the windowone stem · 400 nodes a runggenerated from a stated rule, not drawn to look right

    Two windows on one stem

    A pair read off a climbing shoot can only be read through a window, and a window can straddle a transition. Read a second window half a length lower and the outcomes fall into four kinds — and agreement between them never happens on a shoot whose rung is shorter than the window, which turns the most awkward of the four refusal causes into something a reading can certify.

    rung 1 · emergence
  2. -0.50000.50011.502-2.30-2-1.50-1-0.5000disturbance, in degrees of azimuth (logarithmic)the scatter a protractor would record, in degrees (logarithmic)no lattice left above here3 of 5 silent3 of 5 silent400 nodes a rung · five stems a pointgenerated from a stated rule, not drawn to look right

    A refusal with a reason

    Three phase plans running have recorded that a refusal has four causes and the sequence separates none of them. With a second window and a protractor, three are separated: silence at 0.38° of scatter is a quiet plant, silence at 56° is a disorderly one, and agreement certifies the rate. The fourth survives, and so does a worse discovery — agreement is not correctness.

    rung 2 · wrong

All ladders