Phyllotaxis
the spirals are counted, not admired
Concept

Convergents — where it appears

The successive best rational approximations produced by a continued fraction. Their denominators are the parastichy numbers a lattice shows, and the ladder a stem walks as its rise falls is the sequence of them.

Named by 17 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The spiral counts four different divergence angles produce. Fibonacci counts come from one angle. The Lucas angle — which the same dynamical model reaches on a different branch — gives 47 and 76, and neither number is a Fibonacci number.

Fibonacci is a branch, not a law

Fibonacci counts come from one branch of the model. The Lucas branch — which the same rule reaches at a different growth rate — gives 47 and 76, and neither is a Fibonacci number. The sequence is a consequence of an angle rather than a property of plants.

wrong · Fibbranch The version of the claim that does survive measurement. The golden angle scores 0.4377, against 0.3462 for the best of 938 other angles sampled. The dashed line is Hurwitz's 1/√5, which no number can exceed.

The claim that survives

Of the three famous assertions about this subject, one is out by a factor of two, one is true of a branch rather than of plants, and one is right — in a sharper form than the version usually told, and about arithmetic rather than about packing.

wrong · Hurwitz Every transition as the rise falls. The pair climbs 1/2 → 2/3 → 3/5 → 5/8 → 8/13 → 13/21. Consecutive transitions are 0.382, 0.382, 0.383, 0.382 of the previous rise — 1/φ² is 0.3820.

The Fibonacci ladder

Lower the rise on a cylinder and the parastichy pair climbs — 1 and 2, then 2 and 3, then 3 and 5 — each rung the sum of the two before it. Nothing in the arithmetic mentions Fibonacci, the transitions sit at computable rises, and consecutive ones stand in the ratio 1/φ².

cylinder · Ladder The angles against the positions, rise by rise. five rises, five seeded stems each. A filled mark is a run whose angle readout returned the pair the position counter finds in the same stem; an open mark is a refusal. At 0.032 the counter says 3/5 and the angles agree on 0 of 5, refusing 5. At 0.013 the counter says 5/8 and the angles agree on 5 of 5. At 0.01 the counter says 5/8 and the angles agree on 5 of 5. At 0.005 the counter says 8/13 and the angles agree on 5 of 5. At 0.008 the counter says 5/8 and the angles agree on 2 of 5, refusing 3. The two instruments share no code path: one is given a list of angles, the other a list of coordinates.

The angles name the branch

Seed the same rule at the Lucas angle and the readout returns 4 and 7, then 7 and 11 — the pairs the position counter finds, and not Fibonacci numbers. So a list of divergence angles carries not only how many spirals there are but which family of ladders the plant is on.

lattices · Counting The neighbourhood of 21/55, and where its background was taken from. μ₂ across nine tenths of a degree either side of 21/55, on a head of 825 organs — 15 in each of its 55 rows. The deep notch at the centre is the dip. The shaded columns are the offsets now used as a background: those at least 0.03° from every rational with a denominator of 60 or less, of which there are 54 here. The marked sample at 0.2° is the one the earlier work used, and it lands 0.007° from 13/34 — inside that rational's own dip. It reads 0.115 against a floor of 0.148, so measured that way the dip is an inversion. The clear offsets give 0.339.

The background is not one sample

The dip in disorder at a rational angle is a comparison against a background, and the background was one measurement taken two tenths of a degree away. At 21/55 that lands seven thousandths of a degree from 13/34 — inside another rational's dip — and the comparison inverts. Fixed, the dip survives to a denominator of 89.

tissue · Second statistic The coefficient is not one number. n²·w, measured at the two larger of each denominator's three head sizes and averaged, for six Fibonacci fractions. Undivided it runs 1188, 1285, 2999, 7005, 9125, 14297 — a spread of 12.0. Divided by the denominator it runs 149, 99, 143, 206, 166, 161 — a spread of 2.1. So the law is w ≈ 150·q/n² to within a factor of two, and that earlier work's constant of 1,400 to 3,300 was three measurements of the small-denominator end of it.

The width carries the denominator

The earlier work measured three denominators, found the dip's half-width falling as the square of the head size, and could not say whether its coefficient depended on the denominator. Six denominators say it does: the coefficient runs from 1,188 at q = 8 to 14,297 at q = 89, and dividing by q flattens a factor of twelve into a factor of two.

tissue · Second statistic Four fractions of 55, one width. The half-width of the second-moment dip at four divergence angles with the same denominator, on heads of 1279 organs — 23 in each of 55 rows. 21/55 is the Fibonacci convergent, the fraction every earlier measurement of this law was made at and the one whose neighbourhood is emptiest; 12/55, 23/55, 17/55 are not. The four agree within a factor of 1.28, well inside the factor of two the law is stated to, so the width is a function of the denominator and not of how well the fraction approximates its neighbours. What is left over is ordered by the note beside each bar: the more crowded the neighbourhood, the wider the dip comes out, which is the direction a neighbour's own shoulder would push it.

Four fractions with one denominator

The dip in a head's side-count disorder is as wide as 150·q/n², measured over six fractions — every one of them a Fibonacci convergent, which is the emptiest neighbourhood a denominator ever gets. So the law could be about the denominator or about how well the fraction approximates its neighbours. Four fractions of 55 at one head size settle it in one figure.

tissue · Second statistic Four fractions of 34, one width. The half-width of the second-moment dip at four divergence angles with the same denominator, on heads of 791 organs — 23 in each of 34 rows. 13/34 is the Fibonacci convergent, the fraction every earlier measurement of this law was made at and the one whose neighbourhood is emptiest; 9/34, 15/34, 11/34 are not. The four agree within a factor of 1.14, well inside the factor of two the law is stated to, so the width is a function of the denominator and not of how well the fraction approximates its neighbours. What is left over is ordered by the note beside each bar: the more crowded the neighbourhood, the wider the dip comes out, which is the direction a neighbour's own shoulder would push it.

A width read off a staircase

Two fractions of the fourteen measured return a dip width that moves by a factor of two when the head size changes, where the others hold to three per cent. The cause is not their neighbourhood. It is that the disorder statistic changes only when the tessellation changes, so the curve a half-width is read off is a staircase, and a width narrower than the tread cannot be read at all.

tissue · Second statistic The area never settles, so the number reported is the window. The equivalent width of the disorder dip — the area of the deficit divided by the dip's own depth — for four fractions with a denominator of 34, against the window it was integrated over. The window is in scaled units, u = δ·n²/q, so a head of any size is sampled at the same places on its own dip; 200 scaled units is about 0.0109° at these head sizes. A width would show as a flat stretch. There is none: every line climbs to 512 scaled units or so and then turns over, because past that the window has reached far enough towards the next rational that it is integrating the neighbour's dip instead of this one's background. The dip has a depth and a scale; it does not have an outer edge, and an integral of something with no outer edge is a statement about where it was stopped.

A dip with no outer edge

The disorder of a head dips at every rational divergence, and how wide that dip is has carried a long argument. Reading the width as a level crossing has a resolution problem, and the obvious repair is to integrate instead. The integral reproduces beautifully across head sizes and never settles on a value, because there is nothing out there for it to settle against.

tissue · Second statistic The area never settles, so the number reported is the window. The equivalent width of the disorder dip — the area of the deficit divided by the dip's own depth — for four fractions with a denominator of 55, against the window it was integrated over. The window is in scaled units, u = δ·n²/q, so a head of any size is sampled at the same places on its own dip; 200 scaled units is about 0.0067° at these head sizes. A width would show as a flat stretch. There is none: every line climbs to 595 scaled units or so and then turns over, because past that the window has reached far enough towards the next rational that it is integrating the neighbour's dip instead of this one's background. The dip has a depth and a scale; it does not have an outer edge, and an integral of something with no outer edge is a statement about where it was stopped.

The window is the neighbour

An integral needs a limit, and this one has two conditions on it that pull opposite ways. It has to scale with the dip, so that two head sizes are comparable, and it has to stay clear of the next rational, which is a fixed distance in degrees. Between them there is no stretch where the answer holds still — and the limit that decides it is the crowding.

tissue · Second statistic The disorder of a head against its divergence angle, 900 points. μ₂ is the mean squared departure of a Voronoi cell's side count from six, measured on 900 points inside 86% of the radius. Swept across 1.32° it is a staircase: flat over stretches of a few hundredths of a degree, with sharp steps between them and narrow deep dips wherever a rational falls. At 137.143° — which is 360 × 8/21 — it is 0.025; At 137.882° — which is 360 × 18/47 — it is 0.125; At 138.002° — which is 360 × 23/60 — it is 0.089. The golden angle is marked and sits at 0.253, in the middle of a flat stretch and nowhere near the largest value on the range.

The most irrational is not the most disordered

If rational angles make ordered tissue, the most badly approximable angle should make the most disordered — which would at last give the golden angle a criterion it wins. Swept across the interval it is the most irrational point of, μ₂ peaks at 138.42° and the golden angle sits unremarkably in the middle.

wrong · Second statistic Two combs, at a rise of 0.005. The autocorrelation of 760 divergence angles from one stem held at a rise of 0.005. The filled teeth are the lags at multiples of 8; the open teeth are the second comb, at the same spacing offset by 5. Reading the spacing off the first and the offset off the second gives the pair 8 and 13, which is what the position counter reports for the same stem — from angles alone, with no coordinate anywhere in the calculation.

The second comb

The autocorrelation of a divergence sequence has peaks at the smaller parastichy number and at every multiple of it. It also has a second set of peaks, at the same spacing, offset by the difference of the pair — so a list of angles with no coordinate in it returns both numbers rather than one.

cylinder · Sequence Two combs, at a rise of 0.013. The autocorrelation of 760 divergence angles from one stem held at a rise of 0.013. The filled teeth are the lags at multiples of 5; the open teeth are the second comb, at the same spacing offset by 3. Reading the spacing off the first and the offset off the second gives the pair 5 and 8, which is what the position counter reports for the same stem — from angles alone, with no coordinate anywhere in the calculation.

A harmonic is a step taken twice

The spectrum contains the larger parastichy number, their sum, and echoes of the smaller one, and no ranking of peak heights separates them. What separates them is arithmetic: a harmonic is a multiple of the spacing and a family is not, and the two kinds sit in different residue classes.

cylinder · Sequence The order follows the window, so it was never the fractions'. The four fractions with a denominator of 34, ordered four ways. The left column puts them in order of how close the nearest other rational is — the crowding — with the most crowded at the top. The other three order them by the area of their dip, at windows of 50, 100, 200 scaled units. The residual claim this thread carried was that the most crowded fraction gives the widest dip, which would make all four columns the same order. They are not: the order changes between the first two windows and settles, from a window of 100 outwards, into 11/34 > 15/34 > 13/34 > 9/34 — which is not the crowding order either. A quantity that reverses when the measurement is stopped somewhere else is a property of the stopping.

The order belonged to the method

A residual was left over after the two width laws, and it looked ordered: the most crowded fraction gave the widest dip, in all three families, in the direction a measurement artefact would take. Measured again with an instrument that has no level in it, the order changes with the window, disagrees between families, and in one of them comes out backwards.

wrong · Second statistic The largest empty circle of a 2400-organ 137.508° golden head, ring by ring. Each dot is the largest empty circle in one ring of the head, on the interior's scale. The whole head's is 0.8437 at radius 0.871, at the centre; the rings peak at the radii where the lattice flips from one pair of neighbours to the next, and at the 4 flips beyond radius six the head reads within 0.0020 of the closed form. The dashed line is 1/√2 = 0.7071.

One over root two

On the interior's scale a golden head's largest empty circle is 0.8435 of a spacing at every size from 150 organs to 2,000, because one triangle at its centre decides it. Everywhere else it is 1/√2 — a square cell at every ring where the lattice flips — and a closed form in the angle's continued fraction says that only noble angles hold it there.

tissue · Gapgrowth Every angle whose counts from 34 to 144 resist approximation within a per cent of the golden angle's. Over the counts a head shows from 34 to 144, an angle scores like the golden angle when those counts add up, each the sum of the two before, from a first pair near the golden ratio. 46 angles between 20° and 180° come within one per cent of its score of 0.44718, each drawn as a stem at its angle. The five nearest are 137.51° with counts 34, 55, 89, 144 at 100.000 per cent; 99.50° with counts 47, 76, 123 at 99.989 per cent; 106.45° with counts 44, 71, 115 at 99.931 per cent; 151.14° with counts 50, 81, 131 at 99.919 per cent; 132.18° with counts 49, 79, 128 at 99.907 per cent. The golden angle is the highest, and the Lucas angle at 99.50° is a ten-thousandth of the score behind it.

What a head can mean by most irrational

Hurwitz's bound, the one famous claim about this subject that survives, is a limit over every denominator, and a head shows only the counts between its innermost spirals and its rim. Over those counts an angle resists approximation like the golden angle exactly when the counts it shows add up, each the sum of the two before, from a pair near the golden ratio — and every such pair has an angle of its own. The golden angle still scores highest over every window measured, by a ten-thousandth: over counts from 34 to 144 the Lucas angle is 99.989 per cent of it and forty-six angles are within one per cent. What separates the golden angle from them is below the counts they share, at the centre of the head.

wrong · Hurwitz The first organs of a golden head, a Lucas head and a head at 104.67°, with each one's closest pair. The organs within a radius of 7.2 of three Vogel heads — the first 51 organs after the one at the centre — at the golden angle, the Lucas angle and 104.67°, three of the forty-six angles whose counts from 34 to 144 resist approximation within a per cent of the golden angle's. The joined pair in each is its closest: organs 1 and 4, 1.602 apart, at the golden angle; 1 and 5, 1.574 apart, at the Lucas angle; 12 and 19, 1.241 apart, at 104.67°. Out here the three are already different drawings; by a radius of seventeen they are not.

The first three hundred organs

Over the counts a head shows, forty-five angles resist approximation within a per cent as well as the golden angle, and what separates them is at the centre. Grown as heads and measured there, the golden angle has the widest closest pair of all forty-six — by organs 1 and 4, the count its arithmetic names — and keeps first place only while the centre is in the reading. Its rivals stay a per cent apart from it out to a radius that tracks where their spiral counts start to add up, and every one of them is within a per cent by the 289th organ. By the largest hole it is never the best.

wrong · Hurwitz

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Continued fractionDivergence angleHonest limitsMeasurementRational approximationRational angleSummary statisticArtefactSamplingDisorderFibonacciφ, the golden ratio

All concepts