Drift — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The drift goes the other way
A rule that corrects what its neighbourhood shares should let through any disturbance slower than its own reach, and should suppress anything faster — a crossover, tracking the depth. Swept over a neighbourhood that changes by a factor of sixty, there is no crossover anywhere, and the deep rule passes nearly four times as much as the shallow one. The prediction is not weakly supported; it is backwards.
What the ratio was hiding
The statistic that says a rule sharpens a drift rises by a factor of nearly four across a sweep of the rule's depth. Undo the normalisation and ask instead how many degrees of drift actually reach the divergences, and the answer changes by a fifth. Nearly all of the effect was in the denominator, and the denominator is the thing the rule is good at.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
AutocorrelationDiscriminationFalsifiabilityHonest limitsMeasurementNegative resultNeighbourhood depthNoiseThe placement ruleRepulsionSelf correctionArtefact