Normalisation — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Packing, measured four ways
The claim is that the golden angle packs best, and it is measurable. Read on the interior of a head, the two criteria about distance put the golden angle first among the angles near it and the two about cells are won by rational angles — which makes the claim half right, and makes the right half a statement about a class of angles. An earlier reading of the same four criteria, divided by the cells at the head's edge, said the opposite.
Packing, measured against the interior
An earlier reading of these heads reported that no packing criterion singles out the golden angle and that three criteria give three winners. Every one of those readings was divided by a mean cell area that, on a head of 150 organs, was 38.8 where the interior's is π. Divided by the interior's own, the criteria about distance put the golden angle first of 72 angles and the criteria about cells go to rational ones.
A gradient keeps Lewis's slope and takes its share
Lewis's law is reported as two numbers, a slope and how much of the variation in cell area it explains, and they get read as one. Grow a tissue's cell size steadily across the field of view and the two part completely. Over a gradient that takes cells from one size to several times that, the slope of a random tissue stays at 0.22 and its explained share falls from 33 per cent to 15. Both are predicted by a line of arithmetic from the flat tissue's own numbers, to within a percentage point or two. Dividing the field into twelve bands of radius restores nearly all of it. So a weak Lewis correlation in a published field may be a statement about the field.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Cell areaHonest limitsLargest gapNearest neighbourRim effectSelf-correctionSummary statisticVoronoi cellsVoronoi cell areaArtefactAsymptotic claimCriterion dependence