Settling criterion — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A destination or a refusal
Sixty-three wrecked runs were regrown to twelve hundred organs and put to the settling table's own criterion, unchanged in every tolerance. The prediction written down before the sweep said twenty-nine would settle; seventeen do, and the prediction is wrong on its own side of the table as well as in its total.
Like with like
Seventeen wrecked runs settle when regrown to four times their length, and every one of them settles at the divergence the short run already reported. The endpoint moves by four thousandths of a degree at worst, which makes the short reading precise about where and silent about whether.
What a run length was hiding
The settling criterion returns an identical verdict on all sixty-three wrecked runs at every length from three hundred organs to twelve hundred, so run length explains nothing. What the sweep does find is that an endpoint is a mean over an orbit, and thirty-four refusers never come within a degree of their own reported endpoint.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Claim testingEndpointHonest limitsNegative resultSettlingSummary statisticAttractorDestinationMeasurementOrbitRefusalAblation