Settling — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Also named here as starting angle — the same set of essays touches all of them, so they are one junction rather than several.
A basin has a width
A destination reached from one starting angle is a presence. A destination reached from seven consecutive starting angles spanning forty-five degrees is a basin with an extent, and nine angles could not have measured one — they were too far apart to have two of them land in the same place.
A wall that stopped moving
Four falloff exponents were reported not to move the rise below which stems stop reaching a lattice. Their measured walls spanned a factor of two and ordered themselves 2, 5, 3, 4. At twenty starting angles they span a fifth of one and order themselves 5, 4, 2, 3 — so the conclusion was right and its arithmetic was noise.
Round numbers are not a sample
The nine starting angles the settling table was grown from reach a lattice four times in ten. Eight angles placed exactly halfway between them reach one a quarter of the time. The difference is not noise and it is not the range — several of the nine sit next door to somewhere a stem could settle.
Twenty angles instead of nine
Every claim in this collection about where a stem ends up rests on nine starting angles a cell, and the file that uses them says so — it computes a binomial error of 0.17 and declines to read a spread against it. Eleven more angles halve that error and change what several of the numbers were.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
BasinClaim testingHonest limitsMeasurement errorSample sizeSamplingStarting angleDivergenceNull modelFalloff exponentResolutionArtefact