Destination — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The window nobody varied
Every parastichy pair this collection reports about the settling table was counted over the top two hundred organs of a run, and that number had never been moved. Moved seventeen ways across a factor of forty, on all three hundred and eighty-four settled runs, it changes nothing at all.
A sequence that was a reading
One of the settling table's additive sequences rested on a single count that skipped a term, and the account of it was that the count had been taken over the wrong patch. It was not. The counter works out whether its two families wind opposite ways and the reading throws the answer away, on five runs in three hundred and eighty-four.
A destination or a refusal
Sixty-three wrecked runs were regrown to twelve hundred organs and put to the settling table's own criterion, unchanged in every tolerance. The prediction written down before the sweep said twenty-nine would settle; seventeen do, and the prediction is wrong on its own side of the table as well as in its total.
What a run length was hiding
The settling criterion returns an identical verdict on all sixty-three wrecked runs at every length from three hundred organs to twelve hundred, so run length explains nothing. What the sweep does find is that an endpoint is a mean over an orbit, and thirty-four refusers never come within a degree of their own reported endpoint.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Claim testingHonest limitsSettlingAttractorNegative resultCensusCensus designEndpointParastichy pairReading windowSettling criterionSummary statistic