Concept

Census — where it appears

8 essays name this object, across 4 fields. What follows is each of them, and the objects they name alongside it.
W = 2.40 · D = 0.42W·D = 1.01 — evolute

Raup's three numbers

Nearly every coiled shell that has ever existed is a point in a three-dimensional space — how fast the whorl expands, how far the opening sits from the axis, how far it travels along it. That is a remarkable compression, and the most useful line in the space is the one where the whorls come apart.

shells · raup
5/107.9%5 × 1/23/67.9%3 × 1/22/46.1%2 × 1/24/85.5%4 × 1/27/145.2%7 × 1/26/122.8%6 × 1/28/160.1%8 × 1/2share of divergences at this riserise 0.008 · 3600 divergences35.4% share a factor

What "whorled" was hiding

The expansion phase's census put 35% of divergences in a bucket labelled whorled and moved on. Opened, every pair in it is k and 2k — the coarsest rung of the ladder, repeated k times — and reading the census up to jugacy takes the Fibonacci share from 14.7% to 50.1% without describing a single extra plant.

wrong · jugate census
1 at a time2 and 3symmetry order 12 at a time2 and 4symmetry order 23 at a time3 and 6symmetry order 3divergences 137.51° · 68.75° · 45.84°counted 2/3 · 2/4 · 3/6

Two at a time

Every counter on this site asks how far it is from element i to element i plus m, and that index is a claim that the elements arrived one at a time. For teasel, for Cephalaria and for a real minority of plants the claim is false — and what those patterns turn out to be is an ordinary lattice, wrapped twice.

lattices · jugacy
Fibonacci59.6%Lucas20.8%whorled10.7%other8.9%5 distinct pairs over 1200 divergencesrise 0.100Fibonacci 59.6%

How often is it Fibonacci

The claim that plant spirals come in consecutive Fibonacci numbers is stated as a near-universal. Asked of the geometry, the answer collapses with scale — at a coarse rise 67% of divergences give Fibonacci pairs, and at a fine one 15%, with whorled and unnamed pairs taking the rest.

wrong · frequency
646668701234567fork number down the treedivergence at the fork (°)137.5078/2 = 68.7539°2-jugate · 7 forkslast fork 68.7365°

Half the golden angle

The forks of the van Iterson tree converge on 137.5078° and sit at none of them. Divide the whole tree by two and the same thing happens at 68.7539° — which is where teasel is, and where a bijugate sunflower counted 42 and 68 has to be.

lattices · jugate limit
00.2500.5000.75015101520specimenschance of detecting it14 specimens90%exact binomial · one-sided at α = 0.0514 specimens, cut at 5

How many plants would it take

Fourteen specimens separate the geometry's Fibonacci share from a coin weighted to a half. Four separate it from what a grown history gives. One fir cone measured at three rings settles whether its ladder is spaced as a cone's or an ogive's. The sample sizes are small, and that is the uncomfortable part.

wrong · sample size
grown from a coarse start100.0%divergence chosen at random10.8%share ending on a consecutive Fibonacci pair16 grown runs, starting divergences from 67° to 299°every one of them ended on 8/1367 nodes per rung · rise 0.4 → 4.8e-3100% against 10.8%

Continuity from a coarse start

At a fine rise, one divergence in seven gives a Fibonacci pair. Grow a stem from a coarse start at a divergence nobody chose, down to that same rise, and sixteen runs out of sixteen end on 8/13. The expansion phase's interpretation was that continuity does the work; this is the measurement it never had.

emergence · continuity
plants show consecutive Fibonacci pairs far more…4and more often even than a coin weighted to a half14a conifer cone's rings are spaced as a cone rather…1multijugate patterns are a real minority rather than…34against 14.7%, if the truth is 90%needs: the pair, at a stated rungagainst 14.7%, if the truth is 50%needs: the pair, at a stated rungagainst φ² = 2.62, if the truth is φ^(2/1.88) = 1.67needs: three ring positions, to ±3%against 2%, if the truth is 15%needs: the pair; the whorl's symmetryspecimens neededexact binomial · α = 0.05 · power 0.91 to 34 specimens

The survey this site cannot do

Four phases of asking for a dataset, and it is still not here. What this phase can do instead is specify it — the fields, the sampling, the sizes, and which of this collection's claims each one would settle. Two of the four fields asked for turn out to be worth less than the asking implied, and one was never asked for at all.

wrong · survey spec

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

RiseFibonacciJugacyBranchSurveyBijugateDivergence angleLadderRotational symmetryWhorlContinuitySample size

All concepts