Fibonacci share — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Also named here as generous reading — the same set of essays touches all of them, so they are one junction rather than several.
What "whorled" was hiding
The earlier work's census put 35% of divergences in a bucket labelled whorled and moved on. Opened, every pair in it is k and 2k — the coarsest pair of the sequence, repeated k times — and reading the census up to jugacy takes the Fibonacci share from 14.7% to 50.1% without describing a single extra plant. By the lattice's own two families it moves nothing, and the share is 3.2% either way.
A shared factor has two readings
A report whose two counts share a factor has been read two ways. One account says it is a miscount announcing itself, since a true ordinary pair cannot share one. The other says it is a plant grown k organs at a time, and that reading took a census's Fibonacci share from a seventh to a half. It is one piece of evidence, and nobody has compared the rates. Above the smallest pair, at least two of the four reports one count from a Fibonacci pair share a factor and carry a family's name: 21/35 reads as seven whorls of 3/5, and 33/55 as eleven. At a chance of 5 per cent that a count is off by one, with 5 per cent of plants truly whorled, a report with a shared factor is a true whorl less than half the time.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
CensusClassificationGenerous readingJugacyBijugateCoprimeFibonacciHonest limitsLadderMeasurement errorParastichy pairRise