Falloff exponent — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A wall that stopped moving
Four falloff exponents were reported not to move the rise below which stems stop reaching a lattice. Their measured walls spanned a factor of two and ordered themselves 2, 5, 3, 4. At twenty starting angles they span a fifth of one and order themselves 5, 4, 2, 3 — so the conclusion was right and its arithmetic was noise.
Twenty angles instead of nine
Every claim in this collection about where a stem ends up rests on nine starting angles a cell, and the file that uses them says so — it computes a binomial error of 0.17 and declines to read a spread against it. Eleven more angles halve that error and change what several of the numbers were.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
BasinClaim testingHonest limitsMeasurement errorNull modelSample sizeSamplingSettlingStarting angleDivergenceReproducibilityResolution