Phyllotaxis
the spirals are counted, not admired
Concept

φ, the golden ratio — where it appears

The number whose continued fraction is all ones, and the slowest of all numbers to be approximated by fractions. The golden angle is a turn divided by its square, and the Fibonacci numbers are the denominators of its convergents.

Named by 11 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The rule, 26 steps in, at a growth of 0.40. The next primordium goes where the repulsion is least — the marked minimum at 216°. Nothing in the rule refers to any particular angle.

The angle is an output

137.5° is not a constant of nature. It is where a rule settles — a rule that places each new element as far as it can from the ones already there, contains no reference to the golden ratio, and reaches the same answer from starting angles a hundred and sixty degrees apart.

emergence · Attractor The spiral counts four different divergence angles produce. Fibonacci counts come from one angle. The Lucas angle — which the same dynamical model reaches on a different branch — gives 47 and 76, and neither number is a Fibonacci number.

Fibonacci is a branch, not a law

Fibonacci counts come from one branch of the model. The Lucas branch — which the same rule reaches at a different growth rate — gives 47 and 76, and neither is a Fibonacci number. The sequence is a consequence of an angle rather than a property of plants.

wrong · Fibbranch The version of the claim that does survive measurement. The golden angle scores 0.4377, against 0.3462 for the best of 938 other angles sampled. The dashed line is Hurwitz's 1/√5, which no number can exceed.

The claim that survives

Of the three famous assertions about this subject, one is out by a factor of two, one is true of a branch rather than of plants, and one is right — in a sharper form than the version usually told, and about arithmetic rather than about packing.

wrong · Hurwitz A golden spiral and a nautilus spiral over 2.5 turns, from the same start. After 2.5 turns the golden curve is 7× larger. The growth factors are 6.85 and 3.2, a factor of 2.14 apart.

The nautilus question

A golden spiral grows by 6.854 per turn. Measured nautilus sections give about 3.2. That is a factor of 2.14 — not a rounding error, not an artefact of where the centre is assumed to be, and not close.

shells · Nautilus Every transition as the rise falls. The pair climbs 1/2 → 2/3 → 3/5 → 5/8 → 8/13 → 13/21. Consecutive transitions are 0.382, 0.382, 0.383, 0.382 of the previous rise — 1/φ² is 0.3820.

The Fibonacci ladder

Lower the rise on a cylinder and the parastichy pair climbs — 1 and 2, then 2 and 3, then 3 and 5 — each rung the sum of the two before it. Nothing in the arithmetic mentions Fibonacci, the transitions sit at computable rises, and consecutive ones stand in the ratio 1/φ².

cylinder · Ladder The rise falls as one over the distance from the apex. A straight line of slope −1 on log axes. The dashed horizontals are the transition rises of the cylinder's ladder, computed with no cone anywhere in them; where they cross, the count changes. Consecutive crossings are 2.62, 2.62, 2.62, 2.62 apart — φ² is 2.618.

Transitions a factor of φ² apart

The ladder's rungs are a factor of 1/φ² apart in rise. A disc's rise falls as one over radius squared and a cone's as one over distance, so the same rungs land a factor of φ apart on a seed head and a factor of φ² apart on a cone — measured, on both, by a counter that has never heard of either.

cylinder · Cone transitions Every assumed centre from 0.01 to 500 innermost radii, at 19 spans, against a spiral drawn at 3.2. One row per span of arc, one cell per assumed displacement on a logarithmic grid from 0.01 to 500 innermost radii, shaded by the highest growth factor any of 180 directions returns there. A displaced centre reaches 6.854 at every span up to 1.15 turns and at no span from 1.2 upward, so the boundary is a span rather than a displacement. The dashed rule is the two-turn span floor, and the cheapest golden fit anywhere leaves a residual of 0.163 against a threshold of 0.15 — so a golden reading is refused twice over.

How far a centre must move

Four hundred and eighty-two thousand assumed centres, at nineteen spans and a hundred and eighty directions each, asked whether a spiral drawn at 3.2 can be made to read as the golden 6.854. It can, at every span up to 1.15 turns and at none from 1.2 upward, and every centre that manages it is refused twice over.

shells · Spiral fit The defect rings are not where the counts change — they are √φ further out. A logarithmic radius axis for a golden, 137.508° head. The lower marks are the radii at which the counted parastichy pair changes, where the two shortest lattice vectors change places; the upper marks are the radii at which a cell's neighbours change, where the third-shortest does. They interleave, and the ratio of each ring to the transition inside it is 1.2715, 1.2723, 1.2723, 1.2719, 1.2719, 1.2723 against √φ = 1.27202. Consecutive rungs are a factor of φ apart in radius and √φ is their geometric midpoint, so a defect ring sits exactly halfway between two parastichy transitions. Anyone looking for the defect line at the radius where the counts change will not find it there.

The rings are not the transitions

A seed head has two ladders on it — the radii where the counted parastichy pair changes, and the radii where the exceptional cells sit — and the obvious guess is that they are the same ladder. They are not: the second sits a factor of the square root of phi outside the first at every rung of two different divergence ladders, which is exactly halfway between two consecutive transitions.

tissue · Topological charge A stem is a thread at six rises of the sweep, a ribbon at 23 and a surface at 111. The 140 rises of the sweep, split by how many index families the tessellation carries. On 6 rises above 0.5010 a node has 2 walls and the strip is a thread; on 23 between 0.2187 and 0.4833 it has 4 and is a ribbon; on 111 below 0.2109 it has 6 and is a surface. The comparison means something different in each: two families leave 33.333 per cent in dispute on the surface and 0.00 on the ribbon, and three families leave 0.000 and 33.333.

The third family

On a seed head no threshold makes the counted contacts and the shared cell walls the same relation. On a stem they are the same relation exactly, at every one of a hundred and eleven rises and to three decimal places of nothing, provided the contact cut keeps three families where a count keeps two.

tissue · Neighbour definition Every angle whose counts from 34 to 144 resist approximation within a per cent of the golden angle's. Over the counts a head shows from 34 to 144, an angle scores like the golden angle when those counts add up, each the sum of the two before, from a first pair near the golden ratio. 46 angles between 20° and 180° come within one per cent of its score of 0.44718, each drawn as a stem at its angle. The five nearest are 137.51° with counts 34, 55, 89, 144 at 100.000 per cent; 99.50° with counts 47, 76, 123 at 99.989 per cent; 106.45° with counts 44, 71, 115 at 99.931 per cent; 151.14° with counts 50, 81, 131 at 99.919 per cent; 132.18° with counts 49, 79, 128 at 99.907 per cent. The golden angle is the highest, and the Lucas angle at 99.50° is a ten-thousandth of the score behind it.

What a head can mean by most irrational

Hurwitz's bound, the one famous claim about this subject that survives, is a limit over every denominator, and a head shows only the counts between its innermost spirals and its rim. Over those counts an angle resists approximation like the golden angle exactly when the counts it shows add up, each the sum of the two before, from a pair near the golden ratio — and every such pair has an angle of its own. The golden angle still scores highest over every window measured, by a ten-thousandth: over counts from 34 to 144 the Lucas angle is 99.989 per cent of it and forty-six angles are within one per cent. What separates the golden angle from them is below the counts they share, at the centre of the head.

wrong · Hurwitz The first organs of a golden head, a Lucas head and a head at 104.67°, with each one's closest pair. The organs within a radius of 7.2 of three Vogel heads — the first 51 organs after the one at the centre — at the golden angle, the Lucas angle and 104.67°, three of the forty-six angles whose counts from 34 to 144 resist approximation within a per cent of the golden angle's. The joined pair in each is its closest: organs 1 and 4, 1.602 apart, at the golden angle; 1 and 5, 1.574 apart, at the Lucas angle; 12 and 19, 1.241 apart, at 104.67°. Out here the three are already different drawings; by a radius of seventeen they are not.

The first three hundred organs

Over the counts a head shows, forty-five angles resist approximation within a per cent as well as the golden angle, and what separates them is at the centre. Grown as heads and measured there, the golden angle has the widest closest pair of all forty-six — by organs 1 and 4, the count its arithmetic names — and keeps first place only while the centre is in the reading. Its rivals stay a per cent apart from it out to a radius that tracks where their spiral counts start to add up, and every one of them is within a per cent by the 289th organ. By the largest hole it is never the best.

wrong · Hurwitz

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

FibonacciClaim testingContinued fractionConvergentsDivergence angleBranchHonest limitsTransitionsGeometric ladderHurwitz's theoremLadderLucas numbers

All concepts